In Fixing Immigration From the Ground Up The New York Times published an
opinion from the editorial board on October 6, 2013. Among the
predicaments that face this nation, the question is asked can
California set a conclusive example to nudge the national government
to move forward in immigration reform? Back in June of 2013 the
democratically controlled senate passed a bill for immigration
reform. However, this bill was unpopular in the republican controlled
house. The failed vote for a complimentary path to citizenship for
the 11 million illegal immigrants forced congress back to the drawing
board. The House contended that the enforcement of borders was the
unfolding precedence in debate, while the senate favored an
extension to a broader pathway for citizenship into the country.
California, which
is home to an estimated 2.5 million immigrants, proposed a bill that
was signed by the state. In hoping to spotlight California onto the
national stage, Governor Brown contributed a solution in the form of
a bill, titled The Trust Act. The Trust Act is meant to reproach
Obama’s agenda and congresses idleness by making it harder for the
US Customs and Border Protection agency to deport unauthorized
California’s aliens. Trying to set a positive example for the rest
of the nation, the governor’s goal was to “lessen the problems”
by “protecting [the] civil rights and public safety” of a large
population of California, who are non-violent criminals that “live
outside the law”. Referring to illegal immigrants, as the subject,
the product of The Trust Act set way for other bills and provisions
that were also signed separately by the state of California.
On the agenda,
California has enabled a pathway for certain immigrants to become
licensed lawyers. Other items that have been introduced are issuing
drivers licenses, opportunities to work as poll officials during an
election, and a measure to allow immigrants to serve on juries. The
opinion argues that, by expanding basic human rights while finding
approachable solutions, California is on the leading edge of
immigration reform. Even though a single state cannot fix immigration
reform for the rest of the nation, it can be a start to press
congress for an agreement to move forward on immigration reform.
I can admire the
state for providing a solution to the problem facing immigration
reform. However, the state of California is accomplishing, in my
opinion, a short term fix that could lead to bigger problems. For
instance, the state bills that would let immigrants drive, serve on
juries, and work as polling officials in elections without obtaining
a social security number to fulfill civic duties, scares me. A
thing comes to mind that is not published in this opinion is the fact
that one of the largest banks in the US came out to the public, a
couple of years ago, saying that they would start accepting credit
card applications without a social security number. As being insightful to the argument, the issue of being able to get credit
to pay for transactions, or serving in basic traditional civic duties
without a social security number can lead to bigger problems such as
identity theft. By 2040 it is estimated that minority groups, once
combined, will be the majority of the population within the borders
of the United States.
I believe that we
cannot ignore a predictable trend that in mere decades, immigrants
and minorities will be the majority of the population. I recognize
that the state of California is trying to provide solutions to
the nation and a stagnated congress on immigration reform; but
before applying short term fixes to please a populace, the elected
officials should look at the situation more closely to prevent
overlooked problems that could arise in the future. For now we can
see congress and the other branches of government trapped into a
corner; with two sides brawling over a different policy that has
split the nation on both sides of the fence. As for immigration
reform, the subject remains in inactivity, even if the state of
California moves towards solutions to prod a national government into
action.
No comments:
Post a Comment